Techademy
Capability baseline · 30 minutes

Boards Have Started Asking Which Roles Are AI-Ready Completion Data Cannot Answer That Question

Techademy measures the skills a workforce holds against the roles the business is hiring and promoting into, then reports readiness and the AI gap, role by role.

30 minutes. One live job description, mapped and benchmarked on the call.
51,600
skills in the ontology
1,308
job roles benchmarked
48
enterprise deployments

Already operating at enterprise scale. The baseline runs on the organisation's own roles and people, before any commitment.

Book the 30-minute baseline

30 minutes. No preparation required beyond one job description.

{{ errorMessage }}
The output is the organisation's own capability baseline, not a product tour.
Deployed across enterprise workforces at
Wipro
Infosys
Mphasis
Randstad Digital
KPMG
IBM
Capgemini
NTT Data
The problem

Capacity sits unbilled while roles stay open, and the reporting cannot explain why

Roles across the technology sector are being rewritten faster than the reporting built to track them. The question reaching the CHRO is no longer how much training was delivered, but which roles are ready. Four constraints stand in the way.

The available answer is a completion report

Hours logged and courses completed describe consumption. Neither establishes that a single role is ready.

Skills data sits in four systems that do not reconcile

HRMS, LMS, spreadsheets and manager judgement each hold a version. None produces a number that survives scrutiny in a board pack.

Reskilling spend rises every year; the return on it stays undefined

Leadership knows what capability cost. It does not know what capability returned.

External hiring runs against gaps the organisation may already cover internally

Without a skills view, internal mobility remains an intention and external hiring remains the default.

{{ problemImageAlt }}

None of this is a learning problem. It is a measurement problem, and it surfaces in the board pack, where an unanswerable question costs most.

How it works

Techademy is the measurement layer over the systems already in place

No system is replaced. The learning already being delivered becomes evidence of readiness: by role, by team, by quarter.

{{ stepLabel }}
{{ stepTitle }}

{{ stepBody }}

{{ stepChip1 }}
{{ stepChip2 }}
{{ panelCaption }}
{{ row1Label }}
{{ row1Value }}
{{ row2Label }}
{{ row2Value }}
{{ row3Label }}
{{ row3Value }}
What changes for the people function

Five reporting lines move from activity to evidence

Reporting, AI readiness, business alignment, investment justification and the technology estate, each argued from outcomes rather than consumption.

Today With Techademy
Reporting

TodayCounts activity while the board asks about outcomes.

With TechademyEvery skill gain tracked straight to a business outcome.

AI readiness

TodayA blind spot the board is already asking about.

With TechademyEvery role scored, every gap costed.

Business alignment

TodayBuilt apart from the roles the business needs filled now.

With TechademyEvery pathway tied to real hiring and promotion plans.

Investment justification

TodayBudgets exposed, with nothing to defend them.

With TechademyEvery rupee tied to a role made ready.

Technology estate

TodaySix systems, and no one owns the truth.

With TechademyOne layer. One source of truth.

The board reads one view
Exportable
Coverage vs. need
72%
AI-ready roles
18 of 41
12-month movement
+14 pts
A capability specialist reviewing the board-ready report
The cost of waiting

Every quarter without a capability baseline is a quarter of hiring and reskilling decisions made on estimate

An open senior role in the technology sector carries a replacement cost of roughly ₹9 lakh and a time-to-fill of 5 months. A capability view resolves a share of those roles internally. The rest are hired against evidence rather than assumption.

30 minutes, on the organisation's own roles. The baseline is the deliverable.
Techademy
Capability intelligence